OP-1 LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF OPEN-LABEL SELADELPAR TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS: INTERIM 2-YEAR RESULTS FROM THE ASSURE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yes, Full disclosures sent separately. Seladelpar reduces biochemical markers of cholestasis and pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. ASSURE (NCT03301506) is an ongoing, open-label, long-term Phase 3 trial of seladelpar in patients rolling over from Phase 3 RESPONSE (NCT04620733) or legacy studies (NCT03602560, NCT02955602, NCT03301506, and NCT04950764). We report interim 2-year efficacy and safety results. Patients with insufficient response/intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid could enroll in ASSURE. Key endpoints were composite biochemical response (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × upper limit of normal [ULN], ALP decrease ≥15%, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalization. Pruritus was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS; 0–10). For patients enrolling from RESPONSE, baseline was entry to RESPONSE and analyzed as continuous seladelpar or crossover from placebo; legacy patients were analyzed separately with baseline defined as entry to ASSURE. As of 01/2024, 158 RESPONSE and 179 legacy patients received seladelpar 10 mg daily for up to 155 weeks. In RESPONSE, 61.7% of patients met the endpoint at 12 months (M) vs 20% for placebo. In ASSURE, 61.8% (6M) and 72.4% (12M) met the composite endpoint; 75% (6M) and 93.8% (12M) of placebo crossover patients met the endpoint. In RESPONSE, ALP normalized in 25% of seladelpar and 0 placebo patients at 12M. With continued treatment, 33.3% (6M) and 17.2% (12M) had ALP normalization; 26.9% (6M) and 50% (12M) of crossover patients had ALP normalization. In ASSURE, 6-month change from baseline in pruritus NRS was similar to RESPONSE: −3.8 and −3.7 in continuous and crossover patients, respectively. At 12M and 24M, 73.2% and 69.7% of legacy patients met the endpoint in ASSURE; 42.1% and 42.4% achieved ALP normalization, and reduction in pruritus NRS was −3.8 and −3.1, respectively. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Seladelpar treatment led to improvements in biochemical markers and pruritus, and was well tolerated with long-term use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".