MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405189264 · doi:10.1158/2767-9764.crc-24-0568

First-in-Human Study of 23ME-00610, an Antagonistic Antibody for Genetically Validated CD200R1 Immune Checkpoint, in Participants with Advanced Solid Malignancies

2024· article· en· W4405189264 on OpenAlexaff
Shivaani Kummar, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Scott A. Laurie, Dylan M. Glatt, Sariah Kell, Anh N. Diep, Maike Schmidt, Clifford Hom, Chris German, Suyash Shringarpure, Sophia R. Majeed, Drew Rasco

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityPharmacodynamicsAdverse effectMedicineRashPharmacokineticsDosingImmune systemCmaxInternal medicineOncologyPharmacologyMaximum tolerated doseImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: In this phase 1 portion of a first-in-human phase 1/2a study (NCT05199272), 23ME-00610 was evaluated in participants with advanced solid malignancies to determine its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated to examine potential correlates of efficacy and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible participants (≥18 years) were administered 23ME-00610 intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) using an accelerated titration design followed by a traditional 3 + 3 design, with an initial dose level of 2 mg. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were enrolled across seven cohorts and received a median of four cycles of 23ME-00610. No treatment-related serious adverse events (AE) were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Overall, the PK of 23ME-00610 was linear and dose proportional for doses ≥60 mg, with a median terminal half-life of 13 days at 1,400 mg. Peripheral saturation of CD200R1 was observed for doses ≥60 mg. Immune-related AEs, including rash, pruritus, and hypothyroidism, were predicted by phenome-wide association studies and observed for doses ≥60 mg. A confirmed partial response was observed in a participant with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer whose tumor was among those with the highest tumor CD200 expression. CONCLUSIONS: 23ME-00610 has mild-to-moderate on-target AEs and PK/PD consistent with tumor target saturation and dosing every 3 weeks. The trend for clinical benefit in participants with tumor CD200 expression suggests that 23ME-00610 inhibits CD200R1 signaling and may reverse CD200-mediated immune evasion. Based on PK/PD, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity, 1,400 mg Q3W was selected as the dose for further study. SIGNIFICANCE: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the 23andMe genetic database identified CD200R1 as a promising therapeutic target for cancer. This phase 1 study of 23ME-00610, a CD200R1 antagonist IgG1, showed acceptable safety and tolerability, PK supporting Q3W dosing, and PD and preliminary clinical activity supporting an initial recommended phase 2 dose of 1,400 mg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research CommunicationsSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207