Insight into how fermentation might contribute to the distinctiveness of Australian coffee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With a view to modulating the flavour profiles of Australian coffee, this investigation focused on three estates in New South Wales. Coffee cherries were processed into beans with wet fermented and non-fermented methods to evaluate the effects of fermentation and terroir on microbial population dynamics, volatile composition, and sensory properties. Thirty-three volatiles were quantified in green and roasted coffee beans - 12 esters, 9 alcohols, 6 acids, 3 monoterpenes, 2 norisoprenoids, 1 aldehyde - and 5 thiols were quantified in roasted coffee brews. Sensory descriptive analysis defined appearance, aroma, and flavour attributes to describe the coffee brews. Fermented coffees were characterised by increased intensity of 'black tea leaves' and 'dark chocolate' aromas and 'burnt toast' flavour. Results suggested that wet fermentation of Australian coffee cherries could enhance the content of some volatile compounds known to convey "floral" and "fruity" aromas commonly ascribed to premium coffees from traditional producing regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".