Safety and Tolerability of a 3-Day Fosaprepitant Regimen for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients: Results of an Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase 4 Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convenient multiday dosing of antiemetic regimens for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are needed in pediatric patients, who are more likely than adults to be treated with emetogenic chemotherapy over multiple consecutive days. Intravenous (IV) fosaprepitant is approved for the prevention of CINV in children aged 6 months and older. This open-label, single-arm study assessed the safety and tolerability of a 3-day fosaprepitant regimen (consecutive daily IV administration on days 1-3) plus a serotonin receptor antagonist with or without dexamethasone in pediatric patients (6 months to 17 years) receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. Study treatment was initiated at the start of a chemotherapy cycle (cycle 1); patients completing cycle 1 could participate in optional cycles 2 and 3. Primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and AE-related discontinuation during cycle 1.98/100. Patients completed cycle 1; 69 participated in optional cycles 2 and 3. The AE profile during cycle 1 was typical of cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy; 80/100 (80.0%) patients experienced ≥1 AE. AE rates were generally similar between patients aged 6 months to <2 years (11/15 patients [73.3%]), 2 to <6 years (22/30 [73.3%]), 6 to <12 years (24/25 [96.0%]), and 12-17 years (23/30 [76.7%]). Rates of drug-related AEs (4/100 [4.0%]) and AE-related discontinuations (2/100 [2.0%]) were low. Similar trends in safety outcomes were observed during cycles 2 and 3. No deaths were reported. The 3-day IV fosaprepitant regimen for the prevention of CINV was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".