Proteomic analysis of the Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum SS14 strain: coverage and comparison with the Nichols strain proteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: , group into one of two deep-branching clades: the Nichols clade or the globally dominant Street Strain 14 (SS14) clade. To date, in-depth proteome-wide analyses have focused on Nichols clade strains. Methods: SS14 clade reference strain (SS14) proteome was characterized via protein detection and quantification analyses using mass spectrometry, and comparison was made to the Nichols clade reference strain (Nichols) proteome. Results: SS14 were detected and quantitated, allowing confirmation of expression of 259 proteins for the first time in this strain, including 11 known/putative outer membrane proteins (OMPs). SS14 and Nichols proteome comparative analyses demonstrated similar protein expression/quantification profiles between the two strains, and showed that inter-strain amino acid sequence differences are located primarily within predicted surface-exposed regions in 16 known/putative OMPs. Discussion: SS14 and Nichols strains. The findings inform syphilis vaccine design by confirming the expression of known/predicted OMP vaccine candidates in SS14 treponemes, and via the finding that most inter-strain variable residues found in OMPs are predicted to be located in surface-exposed, host-facing regions of these proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".