MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405319343 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2523

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results from the Phase II TROPiCS-03 Basket Study

2024· article· en· W4405319343 on OpenAlexaff
Loren S. Michel, Antonio Jimeno, Ammar Sukari, J. Thaddeus Beck, Joanne Chiu, Elizabeth Ahern, John Hilton, Caroline Even, Sylvie Zanetta, Sabeen Mekan, Jilpa Patel, Tia Wu, Ecaterina E. Dumbrava

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersGilead Sciences
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineNeutropeniaMucositisAdverse effectNauseaPhases of clinical researchHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaFebrile neutropeniaSurgeryClinical endpointOncologyChemotherapyGastroenterologyHead and neck cancerCancerClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Treatment options for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 inhibitor are limited. Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) is highly expressed in HNSCC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for patients with certain previously treated solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is an open-label, multicohort, phase II study evaluating SG in advanced solid tumors, including HNSCC. Adults with locally advanced or metastatic HNSCC that progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy [given sequentially (either order) or in combination] were administered SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Patients (N = 43) received a median of 3 (range, 2-9) prior anticancer regimens. The objective response rate was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7%-31%], with seven confirmed partial responses. The clinical benefit rate was 28% (95% CI, 15%-44%). The median (95% CI) duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 4.2 (2.6-not reached), 4.1 (2.6-5.8), and 9.0 (7.1-10.5) months, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were diarrhea (47%), nausea (47%), and neutropenia (47%). Grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 58% of patients. Three patients died from TEAE, with one event (septic shock) considered related to SG. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the clinical potential of Trop-2-directed therapy in managing heavily pretreated patients with advanced HNSCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207