The Critical Influence of Spin‐Dry Technique on the Surface Passivation Quality of Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the effects of spin‐dry (SD) and N2 blow‐dry (ND) techniques on the quality and surface passivation performance of silicon oxide grown in ozone‐dissolved deionized water. The SD method achieves greater oxide thickness uniformity, averaging 1.39 nm ± 4.17% across 49 points, compared to 1.68 nm ± 21.67% for the ND wafers. However, persistently poor passivation of ozonated oxide‐grown wafers following the SD process is exhibited, with carrier lifetime, τeff < 0.3 ms and saturation current density, J0 (per side) ranging from 26 to 45 fA cm2. These findings are analyzed in the context of the fundamental phenomena involved in the drying processes of both techniques. Following this, an optimized spin‐drying process is developed, resulting in improved τeff and J0 values of 1.4 ms and 5.6 fA cm−2, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy further confirms that the oxide films dried with the enhanced SD technique are free of pinholes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".