MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405513972 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c09973

Mechanistic Studies on the Gold-Catalyzed Intramolecular Hydroalkylation of Ynamides to Indenes

2024· article· en· W4405513972 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julien Annibaletto, Clément Jacob, Pierre Thilmany, Anaïs Loison, Jorge Escorihuela, Gwilherm Evano

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Alkyne Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsReactivity (psychology)Intramolecular forceDeprotonationChemistryHydrideCatalysisReaction mechanismComputational chemistryCombinatorial chemistryMechanism (biology)StereochemistryHydrogenOrganic chemistryIonPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An in-depth experimental and computational study to rationalize the mechanism underlying the gold-catalyzed intramolecular hydroalkylation of ynamides to indenes is reported. Evaluating the reactivity of a set of deuterated ynamides and gold complexes allowed to get valuable insights into the mechanism of this reaction, while DFT calculations allowed to determine a plausible reaction pathway for this unprecedented transformation. This pathway involves the activation of the ynamide followed by a [1,5]-hydride shift from the highly reactive, in situ generated keteniminium ion, and a subsequent cyclization before deprotonation followed by a final protodeauration. According to DFT calculations, the initial [1,5]-hydride shift was identified as the rate-determining step of the reaction mechanism. Additionally, computational studies allowed to rationalize the differences in reactivity of various ynamides and the pivotal role of gold complexes in the catalysis of this reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicCatalytic Alkyne ReactionsFrench-language works237,207