Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Special Theory of Relativity (STR) has equalized resting mass with energy, the latter being proportional to the squared speed of light ( c ) ( E = mc 2 ). This value exactly doubles the kinetic energy of a mass moving at c speed ( E = 1/2 mc 2 ). Therefore, E = mc 2 could be kinetically explained within the framework of a previously described, four-dimensional (4D) universe ( U 4D ) where the 3D space in which we live ( U 3D ) moves at c speed along its fourth dimension. We have shown that the counterintuitive effects on kinematics and dynamics of the STR can be explained as a misperception of the 4D reality when projected to U 3D . Based on this universe model, E = mc 2 could be interpreted as the sum of the kinetic energy associated with the mass, due to its displacement together with U 3D along the fourth dimension, plus the variation of the kinetic energy of U 3D itself when the mass is either annihilated or created, due to the principle of momentum conservation. This kinetic interpretation of E = mc 2 provides a new framework for our understanding of the Universe through a new-Newtonian perspective. Importantly, our results provide a way to experimentally test our universe model and, additionally, to estimate the mass present in U 3D .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".