mRNA decay pre-complex assembly drives timely cell-state transitions during differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complexes that control mRNA stability and translation promote timely cell-state transitions during differentiation by ensuring appropriate expression patterns of key developmental regulators. The Drosophila RNA-binding protein brain tumor (Brat) promotes the degradation of target transcripts during the maternal-to-zygotic transition in syncytial embryos and uncommitted intermediate neural progenitors (immature INPs). We identify ubiquitin-specific protease 5 (Usp5) as a candidate Brat interactor essential for the degradation of Brat target mRNAs. Usp5 promotes the formation of the Brat-deadenylase pre-complex in mitotic neural stem cells (neuroblasts) by facilitating Brat interactions with the scaffolding components of deadenylase complexes. The adaptor protein Miranda binds the RNA-binding domain of Brat, limiting its ability to bind target mRNAs in mitotic neuroblasts. Cortical displacement of Miranda activates Brat-deadenylase complex activity in immature INPs. We propose that the assembly of an enzymatically inactive and RNA-binding-deficient pre-complex poises mRNA degradation machineries for rapid activation, driving timely developmental transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".