Cerebrospinal fluid β2-microglobulin promotes the tau pathology through microglia–astrocyte communication in Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) β2-microglobulin (β2M) has been demonstrated as an important factor in β-amyloid (Aβ) neurotoxicity and a potential target for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, more investigation is required to ascertain the relationship between β2M and glial activities in AD pathogenesis. In this study, 211 participants from the Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with CSF and Plasma β2M, CSF glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), Aβ42, phosphorylated-tau (P-tau) and total tau (T-tau) were divided into four groups, stage 0, 1, 2, and suspected non-AD pathology (SNAP) based on the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) criteria. Multiple linear regression, linear mixed effects models, and causal mediation analyses bootstrapped 10,000 iterations were used to investigate the underlying associations among β2M and CSF biomarkers at baseline and during a longitudinal visit. CSF β2M concentration decreased with amyloid in stage 1 compared with stage 0 and increased with tau pathology and neurodegeneration in stage 2 and SNAP compared with stage 1. Moreover, CSF β2M level was positively correlated with the Aβ42 (β = 0.230), P-tau (β = 0.564), T-tau (β = 0.603), GFAP (β = 0.552), and sTREM2 (β = 0.641) (all P < 0.001). CSF β2M was only longitudinally correlated with T-tau change. The correlation of CSF β2M with P-tau (proportion = 25.4%, P < 0.001) and T-tau (proportion = 26.7%, P < 0.001) was partially mediated by GFAP in total participants, reproduced in late-life individuals. Furthermore, the astrocyte cascade also partially mediated the pathological relationship between CSF β2M and tau pathology (β2M → GFAP → YKL-40 → P-tau/T-tau, IE: 0.424—0.435, all P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the mediation effects of sTREM2 were not significant. Additionally, there was no association between plasma β2M and CSF biomarkers. CSF β2M is dynamic in AD pathology and associated with neuroinflammation. CSF GFAP might mediate the association between β2M and tau pathology, complementing the existing research on the effect of β2M in AD pathology and providing a new perspective on treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".