MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406050322 · doi:10.1002/alz.088478

Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Cognitively Wellderly Individuals Identifies Potential Protective Genetic Variants for Alzheimer’s Disease

2024· article· en· W4406050322 on OpenAlexaff
Dongyu Wang, Seung Hoan Choi, Sabrina Abbruzzese, Morgan A Rosser, Myriam Fornage, Eric Boerwinkle, Claudia L. Satizábal, Bruce M. Psaty, Oscar L. López, Thomas H. Mosley, Yanbing Wang, Josée Dupuis, Anita L. DeStefano, Sudha Seshadri, Gina M. Peloso

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaApolipoprotein EAlleleLocus (genetics)GeneticsGenetic associationDiseaseOdds ratioMinor allele frequencyGenome-wide association studyAlzheimer's diseaseGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAllele frequencyMedicineBiologyGenotypeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Genetic variants that confer protection from Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may be particularly critical in developing therapeutics. To target protective variant identification, we performed genetic association testing among selected individuals with whole genome sequencing (WGS) that remained alive and dementia‐free beyond age 85 (“Wellderly”). Methods We selected 1,873 White and Black Wellderly individuals with documented normal cognition beyond age 85 as determined by direct, in‐person assessment with WGS from the NHLBI TOPMed project. We used two sets of comparison groups: (i) general controls, non‐Wellderly individuals including persons without and with dementia [n = 8,502] and (ii) individuals who developed dementia before age 85 [n = 810]. We performed generalized mixed model regression for each variant with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1%, as well as analysis of aggregation of rare (MAF ≤ 1%) coding and non‐coding variants via a modified STAAR approach, with and without adjusting for APOE status. Results We observed a reduced likelihood of Wellderly status compared to general controls at the APOE locus (rs429358, MAF = 14%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.69, p = 1.6 × 10‐10), consistent with the known association of the APOE locus with dementia. We also observed 7 coding gene‐based tests associated with Wellderly status at an alpha of 5 × 10‐8 (Figure). For the aggregation of non‐coding variants, we observed Wellderly status associated with PRB4 (p = 4.7 × 10‐10) and suggestively (p<1 × 10‐6) associated with 3 additional genes. None of the variant aggregates showed significant association with Wellderly status when compared to the diseased controls. IKBKB encodes an inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, and deficiency of IKBKB protein in myeloid cells was reported to have improved cognitive functions in the AD mice. KCNK4, the potassium channel subfamily K member 4, plays an important role in controlling the cell potassium flux and dysregulated KCNK4 function can cause neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Conclusion Although only variants in the APOE locus have a reduced likelihood of Wellderly status in the single variant analysis, our aggregated tests suggest genes aside from APOE that are associated with Wellderly status with biological plausibility. We are pursuing replication using the Alzheimer’s disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) WGS data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicGenomics and Rare Diseases→French-language works237,207→