lncRNA <i>CARINH</i> regulates expression and function of innate immune transcription factor IRF1 in macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has provided a new perspective on the centrality of RNA in gene regulation and genome organization. Here, we screened for lncRNAs with putative functions in the host response to single-stranded RNA respiratory viruses. We identify CARINH as a conserved cis-acting lncRNA up-regulated in three respiratory diseases to control the expression of its antisense gene IRF1 , a key transcriptional regulator of the antiviral response. CARINH and IRF1 are coordinately increased in the circulation of patients infected with human metapneumovirus, influenza A virus, or SARS-CoV-2, and in macrophages in response to viral infection or TLR3 agonist treatment. Targeted depletion of CARINH or its mouse ortholog Carinh in macrophages reduces the expression of IRF1/Irf1 and their associated target gene networks, increasing susceptibility to viral infection. Accordingly, CRISPR-mediated deletion of Carinh in mice reduces antiviral immunity, increasing viral burden upon sublethal challenge with influenza A virus. Together, these findings identify a conserved role of lncRNA CARINH in coordinating interferon-stimulated genes and antiviral immune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".