MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406140461 · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13793

Polyfunctional <scp>CD</scp> 8 <sup>+</sup> <scp>CD</scp> 226 <sup>+</sup> <scp>RUNX</scp> 2 <sup>hi</sup> effector T cells are diminished in advanced stages of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

2025· article· en· W4406140461 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Rezaeifar, Shima Shahbaz, Anthea Peters, Spencer B. Gibson, Shokrollah Elahi

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of AlbertaCancer Research Society
KeywordsCytokineBiologyCD8ChemokineCytotoxic T cellDegranulationCCL5ImmunologyEffectorIL-2 receptorCell biologyImmune systemT cellMolecular biologyReceptorIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD8 + T cells, a subset of T cells identified by the surface glycoprotein CD8, particularly those expressing the co‐stimulatory molecule CD226, play a crucial role in the immune response to malignancies. However, their role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), an immunosuppressive disease, has not yet been explored. We studied 64 CLL patients and 25 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HCs). We analyzed the proportion of CD226‐expressing cells among different CD8 + T cell subsets (including naïve, central memory, effector memory, and effectors) in CLL patients, stratified by Rai stage and immunoglobulin heavy‐chain variable region gene (IgHV) mutation status. Additionally, we compared the effector functions of CD8 + CD226 + cells and their CD226 − counterparts. We also quantified cytokine and chemokine levels in the plasma of CLL and HCs. Furthermore, we reanalyzed the publicly available bulk RNA‐seq on CD226 + and CD226 − CD8 + T cells. Finally, we evaluated the impact of elevated cytokines/chemokines on CD226 expression. Our results showed that CD226 ‐expressing cells were significantly decreased within the effector memory and effector CD8 + T cell subsets in CLL patients with advanced Rai stages and unmutated IgHV, a marker of poor prognosis. These cells displayed robust effector functions, including cytokine production, cytolytic activity, degranulation, proliferation, and migration capacity. In contrast, CD8 + CD226 − T cells displayed an exhausted phenotype with reduced Runt‐related transcription factor 2 ( RUNX2 ) expression. Elevated levels of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 beta (MIP‐1β) were inversely correlated with the frequency of CD8 + CD226 + T cells and may contribute to the downregulation of CD226, possibly leading to T cell dysfunction in CLL. Our findings highlight the critical role of CD8 + CD226 + RUNX2 hi T cells in CLL and suggest that their reduction is associated with disease progression and poor clinical outcomes. This study also underscores the potential of targeting IL‐6 and MIP‐1β to preserve polyfunctional CD8 + CD226 + T cells as a promising immunotherapy strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular OncologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207