MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406312686 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200232

Neonatal Encephalopathy

2025· article· en· W4406312686 on OpenAlexaff
Anastasia Ambrose, Vanda McNiven, Diane Wilson, Aleksandra Tempes, Mary Underwood, Vann Chau, Andreas Schulze, Agnieszka Wyszyńska, Karl C. Desch, Anna R. Malik, Saadet Mercimek‐Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenAlberta Health ServicesMcMaster Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniwersytet WarszawskiInternational Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
KeywordsIn silicoGeneEncephalopathyPathogenicityBiologyCopy-number variationGenetic variantsGeneticsMedicineComputational biologyBioinformaticsGenomeInternal medicineGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is characterized by an abnormal level of consciousness with or without seizures in the neonatal period. It affects 1–6/1,000 live term newborns. We applied genome sequencing (GS) in term newborns with NE to investigate the underlying genetic causes. Methods We enrolled term newborns according to inclusion/exclusion criteria during their Neonatal Intensive Care admission. We performed GS trio and applied bioinformatic tools. We developed pipelines for manual filters. We applied in silico prediction tools, protein 3D modeling, and functional characterization to assess the pathogenicity of variants. Results Seventeen newborns fulfilled inclusion criteria. We identified 12 variants in 10 genes. We classified 4 variants in PPP2R5D , BCOR , CFL2 , and SCN2A (previously established disease genes) as pathogenic/likely pathogenic; 7 variants in DST (previously established disease gene), STAB2 , CELF4 , SORCS2 , CTNND2 , and ASTN1 (5 candidate genes) as variants of uncertain significance (VUS); and one variant in STAB2 as likely benign. The CELF4 and ASTN1 copy number variants (CNVs) resulted in structural changes in protein 3D models. The functional characterization of SORCS2 VUS revealed disruption of SorCS2 dimer formation and confirmed its pathogenicity. The functional characterization of STAB2 variants updated their characterization from VUS/likely benign to benign. The CTNND2 VUS resulted in a shift in 3D protein structure. We were not able to perform protein 3D modeling and functional characterization of two DST VUS. We are not certain whether CTNND2 and DST variants may be causative of NE in our study. Discussion The diagnostic rate of research GS was 41% in our prospective study. We broaden the phenotypic spectrum of PPP2R5D -associated Hogue-Janssens syndrome 1, CFL2 -associated nemaline myopathy 7, and BCOR -associated oculo-facio-cardio-dental syndrome to include NE and/or neonatal seizures. We identified 3 candidate genes ( SORCS2, CELF4, ASTN1 ) that may cause NE. We believe that protein 3D modeling is an important tool to assess the pathogenicity of CNVs and may advance the discoveries of novel genetic diseases. However, functional characterization of missense variants is essential for discoveries of novel genetic diseases. It seems that GS can help identify more candidate genes compared with ES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology Genetics→Same topicGenomics and Rare Diseases→French-language works237,207→