MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406312686 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200232

Neonatal Encephalopathy

2025· article· en· W4406312686 on OpenAlexaff
Anastasia Ambrose, Vanda McNiven, Diane Wilson, Aleksandra Tempes, Mary Underwood, Vann Chau, Andreas Schulze, Agnieszka Wyszyńska, Karl C. Desch, Anna R. Malik, Saadet Mercimek‐Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenAlberta Health ServicesMcMaster Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniwersytet WarszawskiInternational Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
KeywordsIn silicoGeneEncephalopathyPathogenicityBiologyCopy-number variationGenetic variantsGeneticsMedicineComputational biologyBioinformaticsGenomeInternal medicineGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is characterized by an abnormal level of consciousness with or without seizures in the neonatal period. It affects 1-6/1,000 live term newborns. We applied genome sequencing (GS) in term newborns with NE to investigate the underlying genetic causes. Methods: We enrolled term newborns according to inclusion/exclusion criteria during their Neonatal Intensive Care admission. We performed GS trio and applied bioinformatic tools. We developed pipelines for manual filters. We applied in silico prediction tools, protein 3D modeling, and functional characterization to assess the pathogenicity of variants. Results: variants may be causative of NE in our study. Discussion: ) that may cause NE. We believe that protein 3D modeling is an important tool to assess the pathogenicity of CNVs and may advance the discoveries of novel genetic diseases. However, functional characterization of missense variants is essential for discoveries of novel genetic diseases. It seems that GS can help identify more candidate genes compared with ES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology GeneticsSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207