Safety and Efficacy of a 48-Month Efinaconazole 10% Solution Treatment/Maintenance Regimen: 24-Month Daily Use Followed by 24-Month Intermittent Use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In an 18- to 24-month Treatment Phase with once-daily efinaconazole 10% solution, subjects with onychomycosis showed an increased rate of cure at Month 24 versus the phase III trials. In order to further improve efficacy, we initiated an extended intermittent efinaconazole Maintenance Phase with use 2-3 times weekly for an additional 24 months from Month 24 to Month 48. These are the first data presented for a 48-month efinaconazole use period. METHODS: For patients completing 18-24 months of once-daily efinaconazole, the target great toenail from the Treatment Phase was graded as 'Clinical Cure' (≤10% affected area) or 'No Clinical Cure' (>10% affected area) at Month 24. Mycological and clinical outcomes were assessed every 4 months from Month 24 to Month 48. There were 35 patients who enrolled in the extension and continued intermittent efinaconazole use to Month 48. Patients with 'Clinical Cure' at M24 were reviewed for sustained cure at M48; patients with 'No Clinical Cure' were reviewed for development of 'Cure' at M48. All patients were reviewed at all visits for adverse events that may be related to efinaconazole use. RESULTS: 'Clinical Cure' was found in 6 of 35 enrolled patients at Month 24, and clinical cure status was sustained to Month 48 with intermittent efinaconazole maintenance use. For 29 patients with 'No Clinical Cure', 3/29 achieved 'Clinical Cure' status at Month 48 with intermittent efinaconazole. Effective Cure and Complete Cure rates improved over the maintenance period to Month 48 in subjects without clinical cure at Month 24. Younger patients showed higher cure rates over the maintenance period, but age group cure differences did not reach statistical significance in this dataset, and 49% of the ≥70-year population had at least a 20% reduction in nail area with maintenance therapy to Month 48. There was only 1 case of possible efinaconazole application site reaction in the Intermittent Maintenance Period to Month 48; prolonged efinaconazole use to Month 48 does not appear to increase the risk of reaction. Efinaconazole use periods are associated with very low positive culture rates in this dataset, including typical contaminant organisms, suggesting efinaconazole presence in the nail plate is providing prophylactic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent efinaconazole may provide suitable prophylaxis of onychomycosis relapse. Prolonged efinaconazole therapy to Month 48 appears to be safe for all ages and can continue to provide prophylaxis of onychomycosis with Intermittent Maintenance use beyond Month 24 to Month 48.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".