MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406408418 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.14.25320259

Glymphatic defect in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder is associated with phenoconversion to Parkinson’s disease

2025· preprint· en· W4406408418 on OpenAlexafffund
Violette Ayral, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Véronique Daneault, Christina Tremblay, Marie Filiatrault, Celine Haddad, Jean‐François Gagnon, Ronald B. Postuma, Petr Dušek, Stanislav Mareček, Zsóka Varga, Johannes Klein, Stéphane Lehéricy, Isabelle Arnulf, Marie Vidailhet, Jean-Christophe Corvol

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSanofi GenzymeAllerganGenentechNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierParkinson CanadaAgence Nationale de la RechercheAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyVoyager TherapeuticsParkinson's UKFondation Brain CanadaAbbVieEuropean CommissionDenali TherapeuticsNeurocrine BiosciencesPfizerBiogenCelgeneNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMeso Scale DiagnosticsVerily Life SciencesTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesAgentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České RepublikySanofiGlaxoSmithKlineAlzheimer SocietyEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseREM sleep behavior disorderGlymphatic systemSleep (system call)MedicineDiseasePsychologyNeurosciencePsychiatryInternal medicineCerebrospinal fluidComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is characterized by the loss of muscle atonia and abnormal, often violent, movements and vocalizations during REM sleep. It is the strongest prodromal marker for progression to synucleinopathies such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). iRBD individuals already show brain changes consistent with manifest synucleinopathies, but their mechanisms remain poorly understood. The glymphatic system is involved in the brain clearance of waste products and its defect has been associated with a higher likelihood of pathological burden and neurodegeneration. The presence of glymphatic system dysfunction revealed by neuroimaging in iRBD and its association with disease progression remain uninvestigated, including its potential to predict conversion toward distinct trajectories of synucleinopathies. We analyzed diffusion-weighted imaging data from a large international multicentric cohort of polysomnography-confirmed iRBD individuals and healthy controls. We used diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space to assess glymphatic function and derived a glymphatic index based on the diffusivity occurring within masks placed on associative and projection fibers adjacent to the lateral ventricles. The index was compared between groups and correlated with motor and cognitive features. Cox regression models assessed the relationship between glymphatic index and the likelihood of conversion to PD, DLB or remaining disease-free. Our analyses included 250 polysomnography-confirmed iRBD participants (mean age 66.5 ± 6.8 years; 87% men) and 178 controls (65.7 ± 6.8 years; 81% men). There was a significantly reduced glymphatic index in iRBD individuals compared to controls. Among the 224 iRBD individuals followed longitudinally (6.1 years, 1-16 years), 65 developed a neurodegenerative disease. iRBD converters exhibited lower glymphatic index compared to non-converters. Lower glymphatic index was associated with a higher risk of phenoconversion towards PD over time compared to remaining disease-free (hazard ratio = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.13-5.25, P = 0.012). This study reports glymphatic dysfunction in iRBD and its potential for predicting conversion to PD, underscoring its utility in identifying at-risk iRBD individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207