A multiprotein regulatory module, MED16–MBR1&2, controls MED25 homeostasis during jasmonate signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mediator25 (MED25) has been ascribed as a signal-processing and -integrating center that controls jasmonate (JA)-induced and MYC2-dependent transcriptional output. A better understanding of the regulation of MED25 stability will undoubtedly advance our knowledge of the precise regulation of JA signaling-related transcriptional output. Here, we report that Arabidopsis MED16 activates JA-responsive gene expression by promoting MED25 stability. Conversely, two homologous E3 ubiquitin ligases, MED25-BINDING RING-H2 PROTEIN1 (MBR1) and MBR2, negatively regulate JA-responsive gene expression by promoting MED25 degradation. MED16 competes with MBR1&2 to bind to the von Willebrand Factor A (vWF-A) domain of MED25, thereby antagonizing the MBR1&2-mediated degradation of MED25 in vivo. In addition, we show that MED16 promotes hormone-induced interactions between MYC2 and MED25, leading to the activation of JA-responsive gene expression. Collectively, our findings reveal a multiprotein regulatory module that robustly and tightly maintains MED25 homeostasis, which determines the strength of the transcriptional output of JA signaling. Wu et al. report that MED16, a novel component of the MYC2–MED25 functional complex in Arabidopsis, stabilizes MED25 by competing with MED25-BINDING RING-H2 PROTEIN1 (MBR1) and MBR2 for binding to the vWF-A domain of MED25, thereby preventing its degradation and activating JA-responsive gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".