Long-Term Engagement of Diverse Study Cohorts in Decentralized Research: Longitudinal Analysis of “All of Us” Research Program Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The generalizability of clinical research hinges on robust study designs, which include the recruitment and maintenance of a representative study population. This study examines the evolution of the demographic characteristics of 329,038 participants who enrolled and participated in The All of Us Research Program (AoURP), a decentralized study aimed at representing the diversity of the United States. Objective: The primary objectives of this study were to assess alterations in the demographic composition of the cohort at different protocol stages within AoURP, while analyzing completion rates and timeframes for survey and substudy completion. Additionally, we examined how participant interactions with the program impacted engagement and survey responses. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the AoURP data, tracking changes in demographic composition, completion rates, and completion times for surveys and substudies. Comparative analyses were performed to assess differences in engagement and survey completion based on sociodemographic characteristics of participants involved in postenrollment study components. Results: The sociodemographic composition of the cohort that participated in the postenrollment study (eg, optional components) differed significantly from that of the recruited population. The proportion of self-identified White participants increased by 21.2%, whereas the proportion of Black or African American participants decreased by 12.18% (P=.02). Participants who identified as White (n=93,614, 52.7%) and NonHispanic (n=109,279, 42.21%) were more engaged compared to those identifying as Black or African American (n=10,887, 15.76%), Asian (n=4274, 38.72%), or Hispanic (n=12,530, 20.7%; P=.006). Participants' response times to study surveys and completeness varied across all demographic groups (P<.001). Furthermore, those identifying as White skipped fewer survey questions (1.19) compared to those identifying as Black or African American (1.40) or other racial and ethnic identities (P<.001). Conclusions: The AoURP dataset serves as an exceptional resource for investigating diverse public health concerns. However, the longitudinal analysis of participant-level data underscores a significant skew in population diversity, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement and retention across all groups. Ensuring diversity in the cohort is essential for maintaining the study's representativeness and the broad applicability of its findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.262 | 0.334 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".