MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406606700 · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102284

Disitamab vedotin in preclinical models of HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers resistant to trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan

2025· article· en· W4406606700 on OpenAlex
Negar Pourjamal, Vadim Le Joncour, György Vereb, Cilla Honkamäki, Jorma Isola, Jeffrey V. Leyton, Pirjo Laakkonen, Heikki Joensuu, Márk Barok

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersSyöpäjärjestötSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöJane ja Aatos Erkon SäätiöBiocenter FinlandHelsingin Yliopisto
KeywordsTrastuzumabTrastuzumab emtansineMedicineOncologyInternal medicineBreast cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Most HER2-positive breast or gastric cancers eventually become resistant to the approved anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Disitamab vedotin (DV) is a novel anti-HER2 ADC that binds to a different epitope on HER2 compared to trastuzumab. We assessed the efficacy of DV in breast and gastric cancer cell lines and xenografts, including tumor models resistant to T-DM1 and T-DXd. Additionally, we investigated whether combining two anti-HER2 ADCs could enhance the efficacy of the individual ADCs. METHODS: The efficacy of DV, T-DM1, and T-DXd, both as single agents and in combinations, was assessed using an AlamarBlue cell proliferation assay in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer cell lines, including those resistant to T-DM1 and T-DXd. The efficacy of DV was evaluated also in breast and gastric cancer SCID mouse xenografts that had progressed on T-DM1 and/or T-DXd. ADC combinations were tested in breast and gastric cancer xenografts. RESULTS: DV was effective in cell lines resistant to T-DM1 and/or T-DXd, and it inhibited the growth of breast and gastric cancer xenografts that had progressed on T-DM1 and/or T-DXd. The combinations of DV plus T-DM1 and DV plus T-DXd showed greater efficacy than the corresponding single agents in both breast and gastric cancer cell lines and xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: DV was effective in treating breast and gastric cancer xenograft tumors resistant to T-DM1 and/or T-DXd. The combination of DV with T-DM1 or T-DXd demonstrated promising activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it