MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406800111 · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.10219

Report on scipost_202411_00019v1

2024· peer-review· en· W4406800111 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boundaries not only are fundamental elements in nearly all realistic physical systems, but also greatly enrich the structure of quantum field theories.In this paper, we demonstrate that conformal field theory (CFT) with a boundary, known as surface CFT in three dimensions, can be studied with the setup of fuzzy sphere.We consider the example of surface criticality of the 3d Ising CFT.We propose two schemes by cutting a boundary in the orbital space and the real space respectively to realise the ordinary and the normal surface CFTs on the fuzzy sphere.We obtain the operator spectra through state-operator correspondence.We observe integer spacing of the conformal multiplets, and thus provide direct evidence of conformal symmetry.We identify the ordinary surface primary 𝒐, the displacement operator D and their conformal descendants and extract their scaling dimensions.We also study the onepoint and two-point correlation functions and extract the bulk-to-surface OPE coefficients, some of which are reported for the first time.In addition, using the overlap of the bulk CFT state and the polarised state, we calculate the boundary central charges of the 3d Ising surface CFTs non-perturbatively.Other conformal data obtained in this way also agrees with prior methods.We also discuss future directions, such as special surface CFT, cone defects, and surfaces of other bulk CFTs.SciPost Physics Submission 5 Real space boundary scheme 17 6 Boundary central charge and OPE from wavefunction overlap 18 7 Discussion and summary 21 A Effective Hamiltonian after pinning orbitals 22 B Conformal perturbation 23 C Complementary data 25 C.1 DMRG convergence test 25 C.2 Results under different calibration 27 C.3 Scaling dimensions of the conformal multiplets 28 C.4 Extraction of bulk scaling dimensions from correlation functions 29 C.5 More correlation functions in the real-space boundary scheme 30 C.6 Finite size correspondence between energy and entanglement spectrum 31 References 32

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9440.877

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207