PENGARUH MOTIVASI DAN BUDAYA KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI MELALUI DISIPLIN KERJA DI CABANG DINAS PENDIDIKAN WILAYAH PROBOLINGGO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every government agency has goals to be achieved by utilizing the human resources owned and managed effectively and efficiently, the human resources owned are required to work professionally, have good motivation, good work culture, good work discipline and good performance. This research aims to determine the influence of motivation, work culture and work discipline on employee performance at the Probolinggo Regional Education Office Branch. Data collection methods by distributing questionnaires, documentation and collecting primary and secondary data. The population and sample of this research were employees of the Probolinggo Regional Education Office Branch totaling 32 respondents. Hypothesis testing in this research uses validity test analysis, reliability test and path analysis test. This research data analysis is assisted by the SmartPLS 4.1.0.6 application. The results of this research show that motivation has no significant effect directly on employee performance. Work culture has no significant effect directly on employee performance. Motivation has a significant effect directly on work discipline. Work culture has no significant effect directly on work discipline. Work discipline has no significant effect directly on employee performance. Motivation has no significant indirect effect on employee performance through work discipline. Work culture has no significant indirect effect on employee performance through work discipline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it