MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406945105 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.252

P-45. A Phase 3, Randomized Trial Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V116, an Investigational Adult-Specific Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, in Pneumococcal Vaccine-Naïve Adults 18–64 Years of Age with Increased Risk for Pneumococcal Disease

2025· article· en· W4406945105 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T. Scott, Jayani Pathirana, Akira Kato, Richard Tytus, Carlos M. Pérez, Nigel Gilchrist, Kwang Ha Yoo, Grzegorz Kania, Michael D. Nissen, Michael Livingston, Amy Falk Russell, Doreen Fernsler, Muhammad Waleed, Jianing Li, Ulrike K. Buchwald, Heather Platt

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunogenicityPneumococcal conjugate vaccineTolerabilityStreptococcus pneumoniaePneumococcal vaccineVirologyImmunologyInternal medicineAdverse effectAntibioticsMicrobiologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Adults with certain underlying chronic medical conditions are at increased risk of pneumococcal disease (PD). V116 is an investigational, 21-valent, adult-specific pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) containing the most prevalent serotypes (STs) associated with PD in adults from regions with established pediatric vaccination programs. The Phase 3 STRIDE-8 study (NCT05696080) evaluated the safety and tolerability of V116 in adults 18–64 years of age at increased risk of PD. Immunogenicity of V116 was compared with sequential administration of 15-valent PCV (PCV15) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). Methods Pneumococcal vaccine-naïve participants with ≥1 underlying chronic medical conditions (including diabetes mellitus, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and lung disease) at increased risk of PD were randomized 3:1 to receive one dose of V116 on Day 1 followed by placebo at Week 8 or one dose of PCV15 on Day 1 followed by one dose of PPSV23 at Week 8. Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Immunogenicity was assessed by serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for STs in V116 at baseline (Day 1) and 30 days post-vaccination (Day 30 for V116 + placebo and Week 12 for PCV15 + PPSV23). Results Of 518 participants randomized, 516 were vaccinated and received either V116 (n=386) or PCV15 (n=130) on Day 1; 96.7% of participants completed the trial. One or more AEs occurred in 265 (68.7%) and 118 (90.8%) participants vaccinated with V116 + placebo or PCV15 + PPSV23, respectively (Table 1). V116 was immunogenic for all 21 STs based on OPA GMTs, with comparable responses to PCV15 + PPSV23 for the 13 STs common to V116 and PCV15 + PPSV23, and higher responses for the eight STs unique to V116 (Figure 1). IgG GMCs were consistent with OPA GMTs (Figure 2). Conclusion V116 is well tolerated and immunogenic in adults 18–64 years of age at increased risk of PD, with comparable immune responses to PCV15 + PPSV23 for common STs and higher immune responses for unique STs. These findings support V116 as a novel population-specific vaccine for the prevention of PD in adults with chronic medical conditions at increased risk of PD. Disclosures Paul Scott, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Jayani Pathirana, MBBS, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Michael Nissen, MD, CSL Seqirus: Education|GSK: Education|Pfizer: Education Amy Falk Russell, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Doreen Fernsler, BS, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Muhammad Waleed, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Jianing Li, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Ulrike K. Buchwald, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Heather L. Platt, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207