IDH-mutant astrocytomas with primitive neuronal component have a distinct methylation profile and a higher risk of leptomeningeal spread
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IDH-mutant astrocytomas are diffuse gliomas that are defined by characteristic mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 and do not have complete 1p/19q co-deletion. The established grading criteria include histological features of brisk mitotic activity (grade 3) and necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation (grade 4). In addition, homozygous deletion of the CDKN2A/B locus has recently been implemented as a molecular marker for grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Here, we describe a subgroup of high-grade IDH-mutant astrocytomas characterised by a primitive neuronal component based on histology and a distinct DNA methylation profile (n = 51, ASTRO PNC). Misinterpretation as carcinoma metastasis was common, since GFAP expression was absent in the primitive neuronal component, whereas TTF-1 expression was detected in 15/19 cases (79%) based on immunohistochemistry. Apart from mutations in IDH1, TP53, and ATRX, we observed enrichment for alterations in RB1 (n = 19/51, 37%) and MYCN (n = 14/51, 27%). Homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion (n = 1/51, 2%) and CDK4 amplification (n = 3/51, 6%) were relatively rare events. Clinical (n = 31 patients) and survival data (n = 23 patients) indicate a clinical behaviour similar to other CNS WHO grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, however with an increased risk for leptomeningeal (n = 7) and extra-axial (n = 2) spread. Taken together, ASTRO PNC is defined by a distinct molecular and histological appearance that can mimic metastatic disease and typically follows an aggressive clinical course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".