MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407240950 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcskn.2025.100284

Prognostic and predictive importance of body mass index and type 2 diabetes in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 phase III trial of pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma

2025· article· en· W4407240950 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver Kennedy, Nina Glassée, Michal Kiciński, Emanuel Buehrer, Sara Valpione, Sara Gandini, Stefan Suciu, Christian U. Blank, Georgina V. Long, Victoria Atkinson, Stéphane Dalle, Andrew Haydon, Andrey Meshcheryakov, Adnan Khattak, Matteo S. Carlino, Shahneen Sandhu, James Larkin, Susana Puig, Paolo A. Ascierto, Piotr Rutkowski, Dirk Schadendorf, Marye J. Boers‐Sonderen, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Jean‐Jacques Grob, Ralf Gutzmer, Rahima Jamal, Alexander C. J. van Akkooi, Caroline Robert, Alexander Eggermont, Paul Lorigan, Mario Mandalà

Bibliographic record

VenueEJC Skin Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersMerck Sharp and Dohme
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineType 2 diabetesCancerOncologyBody mass indexIndex (typography)Diabetes mellitusAlternative medicinePathologyEndocrinologyImmunotherapyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Metabolic conditions, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cause changes in immune function that may influence immunotherapy effectiveness and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Objectives To investigate the prognostic and predictive effects of BMI and T2DM and investigate the effect of BMI on toxicity using data from the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 randomised controlled trial. Methods Pembrolizumab (n = 514) was administered every three weeks for 1 year and prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo (n = 505) among patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Here, we used multivariate Cox regression to investigate associations of BMI and T2DM with RFS, and Fine and Gray regression to investigate the association of BMI with the cumulative incidence of irAEs. Results BMI had an approximately U-shaped association with RFS (p = 0.004) in both treatment arms combined. The RFS hazard ratios (HR)s for BMIs of 20, 30 and 35 kg/m 2 (compared to 25 kg/m 2 ) were 1.28 (95 % CI 1.05–1.56), 0.96 (95 % CI 0.88–1.06) and 1.14 (95 % CI 0.98–1.34), respectively. There was no evidence that BMI was associated with pembrolizumab effectiveness (p = 0.20) or the cumulative incidence of irAEs (p = 0.74). T2DM was not associated with RFS (HR 1.01, 95 % CI 0.73–1.40) in both arms combined and there was no evidence of an association between T2DM and pembrolizumab effectiveness (p = 0.83). In summary, in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma, BMI was associated with RFS in patients overall and within each treatment group. Conclusions BMI appeared to confer a prognostic effect but was not predictive of pembrolizumab effectiveness regarding RFS. BMI was not related to irAEs among patients receiving pembrolizumab, while T2DM was not associated with RFS irrespective of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEJC Skin CancerSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207