MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407295409 · doi:10.3390/ph18020234

Synthesis and Evaluation of 68Ga- and 177Lu-Labeled [diF-Pro14]Bombesin(6−14) Analogs for Detection and Radioligand Therapy of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor-Expressing Cancer

2025· article· en· W4407295409 on OpenAlexafffund
Lei Wang, Chao‐Cheng Chen, Devon E. Chapple, Antonio A. W. L. Wong, Sara Kurkowska, Wing Sum Lau, Carlos Uribe, François Bénard, Kuo‐Shyan Lin

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmaceuticals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsBombesinRadioligandBiodistributionChemistryAgonistIn vivoGastrinRadionuclide therapyEx vivoReceptorNuclear medicineIn vitroCancer researchMedicineBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Overexpressed in various solid tumors, the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is a promising target for cancer diagnosis and therapy. However, the high pancreas uptake of the current clinically evaluated GRPR-targeted radiopharmaceuticals limits their applications. In this study, we replaced the Pro14 residue in our previously reported GRPR-targeted LW02056 and ProBOMB5 with 4,4-difluoroproline (diF-Pro) to obtain an agonist LW02060 (DOTA-Pip-[D-Phe6,Tle10,NMe-His12,diF-Pro14]Bombesin(6–14)) and an antagonist LW02080 (DOTA-Pip-[D-Phe6,NMe-Gly11,Leu13(ψ)diF-Pro14]Bombesin(6–14)), respectively. Methods/Results: The binding affinities (Ki) of Ga-LW02060, Ga-LW02080, Lu-LW02060, and Lu-LW02080 were measured by in vitro competition binding assays using PC-3 cells and were found to be 5.57 ± 2.47, 21.7 ± 6.69, 8.00 ± 2.61, and 32.1 ± 8.14 nM, respectively. The 68Ga- and 177Lu-labeled ligands were obtained in 36–75% decay-corrected radiochemical yields with >95% radiochemical purity. PET imaging, SPECT imaging, and ex vivo biodistribution studies were conducted in PC-3 tumor-bearing mice. Both [68Ga]Ga-LW02060 and [68Ga]Ga-LW02080 enabled clear tumor visualization in PET images at 1 h post-injection (pi). Tumor uptake values of [68Ga]Ga-LW02060 and [68Ga]Ga-LW02080 at 1 h pi were 16.8 ± 2.70 and 7.36 ± 1.33 %ID/g, respectively, while their pancreas uptake values were 3.12 ± 0.89 and 0.38 ± 0.04 %ID/g, respectively. Compared to [177Lu]Lu-LW02080, [177Lu]Lu-LW02060 showed higher tumor uptake at all time points (1, 4, 24, 72, and 120 h pi). However, fast tumor clearance was observed for both [177Lu]Lu-LW02060 and [177Lu]Lu-LW02080. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that [68Ga]Ga-LW02060 is promising for clinical translation for the detection of GRPR-expressing tumor lesions. However, further optimizations are needed for [177Lu]Lu-LW02060 and [177Lu]Lu-LW02080 to prolong tumor retention for therapeutic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmaceuticalsSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207