PCK1 and SLC22A2 gene variants associated with response to metformin treatment in type 2 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic disorder affecting 462 million worldwide, often managed with metformin as first-line treatment. However, metformin's response varies among individuals, including up to 30% experiencing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and 20-50% inefficacy. These differences may be due to various factors, including pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants. The PGx variants documented so far could affect both the safety and efficacy of metformin, but due to a lack of replication studies, none reached the clinical evidence-level needed to be used as a predictive marker for treatment response. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the association between the presence of candidate PGx variants and metformin response in T2D subjects. We conducted an association study involving 108 T2D participants currently or previously treated with metformin. A characterization of their therapeutic response was carried out through questionnaires and pharmacological profile reviews. DNA samples were collected during their single visit to perform genotyping of 24 selected candidate PGx variants. Association analyses between candidate PGx variants and metformin response were performed. Among the subjects included in the analyses (n = 84), 25% were non-responders, and 58% experienced ADRs. At the time of study enrollment, 93.9% of non-responders continued to use metformin. The odds of being a non-responder to metformin are 5.6 times higher for homozygous carriers of the alternative allele of a variant within the PCK1 gene (rs4810083) compared to the other genotypes (95% interval confidence [1.9-16.6]). Two variants in perfect linkage disequilibrium within the SLC22A2 gene (rs316019 and rs316009) were associated with increase odds of having ADRs, where homozygous genotype carriers are 7.3 times more likely to have ADRs presentation (95% interval confidence [1.85-29.01]). This study identified associations between PCK1 and SLC22A2 candidate PGx variants and metformin response in T2D treatment. Additional genetic and functional studies are necessary to elucidate the variants' impact in metformin's pharmacological mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".