Advancing replicable and reproducible GIScience: an approach with KNIME
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reproducibility and replicability (R&R) crisis poses a significant challenge across disciplines, particularly in spatiotemporal studies. This paper focuses on the unique challenges within spatiotemporal research in the context of R&R, including data availability, methodological conception transparency, interdisciplinary collaboration complexities, the balance between R&R and innovation, and R&R education. Recognizing the potential of Scientific Workflow Management Systems (SWMS) to enhance R&R, we introduce a pioneering SWMS-based integrated spatiotemporal research approach (SISRA) utilizing KNIME, an open-source SWMS, to tackle these R&R challenges. First, we developed a set of KNIME extensions, including Geospatial and Dataverse extensions, to enhance spatiotemporal software availability in SWMS. Then we created spatial data virtual laboratory architecture to support multidisciplinary collaboration. Finally, we suggested a geographical research lifecycle that integrates SWMS-based methods to improve practices, efficiency, and innovation in R&R research and education. Our approach exemplifies how executable workflows can not only alleviate the R&R burden on researchers but also strengthen R&R education in geographical research, illustrating the benefits of our approach in training, teaching, and multidisciplinary collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it