RuBisCO Protein as an Antioxidant Emulsifier: Influence of Flavourzyme Enzymatic Modification on Oxidative Stability of Flaxseed Oil-in-Water Emulsion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of the RuBisCO protein (RBS) on its dual antioxidant and emulsifying properties in flaxseed oil-in-water emulsions. The peroxide, para -anisidine, and total oxidation values demonstrated that RBS and Flavourzyme-hydrolyzed RBS (H-RBS) effectively reduced the lipid oxidation rate during the initial accelerated storage days (days 0–4). RBS exhibited superior ability in maintaining a consistent lipid oxidation rate inhibition during the last storage days (days 10–14). Dynamic light scattering revealed an increase in particle size for RBS and H-RBS emulsions, which further stabilized over days 7–14. Despite the high negative ζ-potential, the emulsions had a high polydispersity index (PDI), suggesting interactions with cationic oxidation products at the oil–water interface, contributing to emulsion destabilization. The findings provide valuable insight into the potential application of the dual antioxidant and emulsifying roles of RuBisCO as a sustainable protein for various purposes in food product development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".