MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RuBisCO Protein as an Antioxidant Emulsifier: Influence of Flavourzyme Enzymatic Modification on Oxidative Stability of Flaxseed Oil-in-Water Emulsion

2025· article· en· W4407389605 on OpenAlexafffund
Leticia Lam Hon Wah, Ornella Kongi Mosibo, Chibuike C. Udenigwe

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Food Science & Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsEmulsionAntioxidantOxidative phosphorylationChemistryEnzymeBiochemistryFood scienceChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of the RuBisCO protein (RBS) on its dual antioxidant and emulsifying properties in flaxseed oil-in-water emulsions. The peroxide, para -anisidine, and total oxidation values demonstrated that RBS and Flavourzyme-hydrolyzed RBS (H-RBS) effectively reduced the lipid oxidation rate during the initial accelerated storage days (days 0–4). RBS exhibited superior ability in maintaining a consistent lipid oxidation rate inhibition during the last storage days (days 10–14). Dynamic light scattering revealed an increase in particle size for RBS and H-RBS emulsions, which further stabilized over days 7–14. Despite the high negative ζ-potential, the emulsions had a high polydispersity index (PDI), suggesting interactions with cationic oxidation products at the oil–water interface, contributing to emulsion destabilization. The findings provide valuable insight into the potential application of the dual antioxidant and emulsifying roles of RuBisCO as a sustainable protein for various purposes in food product development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Food Science & TechnologySame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207