Clonal lineage tracing and transcriptomics of cortical progenitor populations reveal maintenance of differentiation potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postnatal neocortical development is a complex period wherein radial glial progenitors (RGPs) complete excitatory neurogenesis and transition to the production of glia. Here, we take advantage of a multi-layered lineage tracing tool pbacBarcode, to examine the contributions of individual cortical RGPs to the postnatal cortex. We reveal that some individual cortical RGPs are multipotent and give rise to olfactory bulb interneurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes in a ∼2:1:1 ratio. We provide evidence that differentiation potential into terminal cell types is maintained as late as post-natal day (P)4, suggesting that a population decline model, as opposed to cell fate restriction, underlies postnatal neocortical development. Moreover, a pool of proliferative intermediary cells, which may represent a multipotent postnatal intermediate progenitor cell population, may contribute to the production of the three major cell types. Lastly, we examine RGP postnatal contribution to oligodendrocytes and show that oligodendrocyte progenitor founder cell production by cortical RGPs is largely complete by P3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".