MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407809194 · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c21700

In Vitro and In Vivo Radiotoxicity and Biodistribution of Thallium-201 Delivered to Cancer Cells by Prussian Blue Nanoparticles

2025· article· en· W4407809194 on OpenAlexaff
Katarzyna M. Wulfmeier, Juan Pellico, P. Machado, Maria Alejandra Carbajal, Saskia E. Bakker, Rafael T. M. de Rosales, Kavitha Sunassee, Philip J. Blower, Vincenzo Abbate, Samantha Y.A. Terry

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsOxford Instruments (Canada)
FundersCentre For Medical Engineering, King’s College LondonEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research UnitUK Research and InnovationMedical Research CouncilUniversity of WarwickWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiodistributionIn vivoThalliumSpect imagingBiophysicsPrussian blueIn vitroMaterials scienceRadiochemistryChemistryNuclear medicineBiochemistryMedicineBiologyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Thallium-201 ( t 1/2 = 73 h) emits around 37 Auger and other secondary electrons per decay and is highly radiotoxic when internalized into cancer cells. However, the lack of effective chelators hinders its application in molecular radiotherapy. This study evaluates Prussian blue nanoparticles, coated with citric acid ( 201 Tl-caPBNPs) or chitosan ( 201 Tl-chPBNPs), as a 201 Tl delivery vehicle compared with unbound 201 Tl + . Cellular uptake and efflux kinetics and radiotoxicity using clonogenic and γH2AX DNA damage assays were evaluated in vitro for both nanoparticle types. Subcellular localization was also assessed using electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Biodistribution of 201 Tl-chPBNPs was evaluated in vivo in mice bearing subcutaneous A549 tumor xenografts, using single photon computed tomography imaging and ex vivo tissue counting. Compared with unbound 201 Tl +, 201 Tl-chPBNPs showed higher cellular uptake, while 201 Tl-caPBNP uptake was reduced. Both showed delayed efflux of 201 Tl from cancer cells. PBNPs prelocalized within cells enhanced the capture and retention of 201 Tl + ions. Both types of PBNPs accumulated in cytoplasmic vesicular compartments and were not visible in the nuclei. Furthermore, 201 Tl-radiolabeled chPBNPs but not 201 Tl-caPBNPs showed significantly greater radiotoxicity than unbound 201 Tl + per Becquerel of radiotoxicity provided in media, resulting from their higher uptake and delayed efflux. However, when corrected for the greater activity accumulated in cells and delayed efflux, the radiotoxicity of 201 Tl-chPBNPs was lower than that of unbound 201 Tl +, possibly due to differences in subcellular localization. These findings highlight the potential of chPBNPs for enhancing the uptake and retention of 201 Tl in cancer cells and development of targeted radionuclide therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207