Efficacy and Safety of Once‐Daily Roflumilast Cream 0.05% in Pediatric Patients Aged 2–5 Years With Mild‐to‐Moderate Atopic Dermatitis ( <scp>INTEGUMENT</scp> ‐ <scp>PED</scp> ): A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Efficacy and safety of roflumilast cream 0.15% were demonstrated in patients aged ≥ 6 years with atopic dermatitis (AD) in two Phase 3 trials. This Phase 3 parallel-group, double-blind trial (INTEGUMENT-PED; NCT04845620) compared the efficacy and safety of roflumilast cream 0.05% and a vehicle in patients aged 2-5 years with AD. METHODS: Patients aged 2-5 years with mild-to-moderate AD were treated with once-daily roflumilast cream 0.05% or vehicle for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) Success (0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear] plus ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 4. Other endpoints included ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) and Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Score (WI-NRS) Success (≥ 4-point improvement in patients with baseline ≥ 4). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 437 and 215 patients treated with roflumilast and vehicle, respectively, significantly greater proportions of the roflumilast group achieved Week-4 vIGA-AD Success (25.4% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.0001), EASI-75 (39.4% vs. 20.6%; p < 0.0001), and WI-NRS Success (35.3% vs. 18.0%; nominal p = 0.0002). Improvement in pruritus was observed within 24 h after the first application (nominal p = 0.0014). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were low in both groups, and 98.9% were mild or moderate. At all timepoints, stinging/burning that caused definite discomfort was reported by ≤ 0.7% of caregivers of patients in the roflumilast group. CONCLUSIONS: In this Phase 3 trial, once-daily roflumilast cream 0.05% improved AD signs/symptoms in patients aged 2-5 years, with early pruritus improvement, low AE rates, and local tolerability comparable with vehicle. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04845620.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".