Rebastinib inhibits FoxO1 activity and reduces dexamethasone-induced atrophy and its-related gene expression in cultured myotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FoxO1, a transcription factor, is upregulated in skeletal muscle during atrophy and inactivation of FoxO1 is a potential strategy to prevent muscle loss. This study identified Rebastinib as a potent suppressor of FoxO1 activity among protein kinase inhibitors. To determine whether Rebastinib inhibits atrophy-related ubiquitin ligases gene expression and mitigates atrophy in mouse skeletal muscle-derived cells, we investigated its protective effects of the compound against dexamethasone (DEX)-induced muscle atrophy using C2C12 myotubes. Rebastinib inhibited the DEX-induced upregulation of atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 mRNA, and atrogin-1 protein. Rebastinib also suppressed protein degradation and increased myotube diameter in DEX-treated C2C12 myotubes. Additionally, Rebastinib ameliorated the DEX- and cachexia-induced reduction in contractile force generation. Although the precise mechanisms underlying the action of Rebastinib against muscle atrophy and its efficacy in vivo remains to be elucidated, this compound shows great potential as a therapeutic agent for muscle atrophy. • Rebastinib inhibited FoxO1-mediated transcriptional activity. • Rebastinib suppressed protein degradation and preserved myotube diameter in dexamethasone treated C2C12 myotubes. • Rebastinib mitigates the reduction of contractile force generation in atrophic myotubes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".