MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407924517 · doi:10.3390/v17030312

Dynamics of a Panzootic: Genomic Insights, Host Range, and Epidemiology of the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b in the United States

2025· review· en· W4407924517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Jawad Jahid, Jacqueline M. Nolting

Bibliographic record

VenueViruses · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital
KeywordsInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1CladeOutbreakBiologyTransmission (telecommunications)VirusVirologyHost (biology)Highly pathogenicInfluenza A virusEpidemiologyLineage (genetic)Avian influenza virusZoologyPhylogeneticsGeneticsMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In late 2021, Eurasian-lineage highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) viruses from HA clade 2.3.4.4b were first detected in the United States. These viruses have caused severe morbidity and mortality in poultry and have been detected in numerous wild and domestic animals, including cows and humans. Notably, infected cows transmitted the virus to cats, causing extreme pathogenicity and death. While human-to-human spread of the virus has not been recorded, efficient transmission of the bovine-origin virus has also led to extreme pathogenicity and death in ferret models. Recently, markers in PB2 (E627K) and HA (E186D, Q222H), indicating mammalian adaptation mutations, were detected in an H5N1-infected patient manifesting critical illness in Canada. These, combined with instances of interspecies spread of the virus, have raised global public health concerns. This could highlight the potential for the virus to successfully adapt to mammals, posing a serious risk of a global outbreak. A One Health approach is, thereby, necessary to monitor and control the outbreak. This review aims to analyze the epidemiology, transmission, and ecological impacts of HPAI A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b in the U.S., identify knowledge gaps, and inform strategies for effective outbreak management and mitigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirusesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207