MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407955028 · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2025.02.004

Yeast mannans promote laxation and specifically modulate microbiota composition in older adults: An open-label pilot study

2025· article· en· W4407955028 on OpenAlexafffund
Matías Bedmar Moreno, Pieter Van den Abbeele, Aurélien Baudot, Thomas A. Tompkins, Diana H. Taft, Jérémie Auger, James Colee, Wendy J. Dahl

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsLallemand (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State UniversityInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of FloridaLallemandUniversity of Florida
KeywordsYeastFood scienceGerontologyBiologyPsychologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Yeast mannans produced less gas than inulin in ex vivo simulation of fermentation. • Yeast mannans elicit minimal symptoms and potential to increase stool frequency. • Yeast mannan supplementation at 15 g/d specifically modulates fecal microbiota. Yeast mannans (YM) are potential prebiotics that may improve laxation. The aim was to evaluate the effects of YM on gastrointestinal symptoms, with a hypothesis of high tolerance. A secondary aim assessed stool frequency. Fecal microbiota composition (16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) and targeted urine metabolites (LC-MS/MS) were explored. An ex vivo simulation of digestion and fermentation (6 donors) compared YM to the reference prebiotic inulin followed by an open-label pilot study, with a 1-week baseline and 2-week intervention of 15 g/d of YM. Ex vivo findings showed increased Bacteroides faecis, B. ovatus, Parabacteroides merdae, P. distasonis, Blautia faecis , and Bifidobacterium spp. in response to YM. Participants ( n = 20, 71.4 ± 11.0 y) reported no change with YM for burping, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence/gas, nausea, reflux/heartburn, or rumblings/noise, rated from 0 for none to 3 for severe symptoms. Cramping/pain marginally increased from baseline (0.02 ± 0.01) to intervention (0.05 ± 0.02; P = .046), as did distention/bloating (baseline, 0.07 ± 0.03; intervention week 2, 0.15 ± 0.05; P = .037). This high tolerability was explained by the ex vivo finding that YM induced less gas production than inulin (–45%). Stool frequency trended higher with YM (1.53 ± 0.15 stools/d) compared to baseline (1.35 ± 0.11) ( P = .079); participants with ≤1 stools/d ( n = 8) showed an increase (0.84 ± 0.14 to 1.19 ± 0.32; P = .016). In vivo compositional changes in fecal microbiota suggest increased B. faecis, B. ovatus, P. merdae, and P. distasonis levels in response to YM. Overall, YM elicited specific microbiota modulation with minimal gastrointestinal symptoms and the potential to increase stool frequency, supporting its prebiotic potential. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05939336). Yeast mannan supplementation elicited specific modulation of microbiota composition in older adults with minimal gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. flatulence) and the potential to increase stool frequency, supporting its prebiotic potential. Microbiota compositional changes were confirmed by ex vivo stimulation of digestion and fermentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition ResearchSame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207