MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408029160 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000614

Rac1 Suppression by the Focal Adhesion Protein GIT ArfGAP2 and Podocyte Protection

2025· article· en· W4408029160 on OpenAlexafffund
Naoyuki Shimada, Jun Matsuda, Kana Asano-Matsuda, Maho Tokuchi, Lamine Aoudjit, Agnieszka Masztalerz, Serge Lemay, Tomoko Takano, Yoshitaka Isaka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOsaka Kidney FoundationKidney Foundation of CanadaIchiro Kanehara Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Sciences and Medical CareJapan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
KeywordsPodocyteGene knockdownFocal adhesionRAC1BiologyCell biologyPTK2Adapter molecule crkProtocadherinCell adhesionTyrosineActin cytoskeletonKidneyCytoskeletonSignal transductionCadherinPhosphorylationBiochemistrySignal transducing adaptor proteinCellProtein kinase AProteinuriaEndocrinologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Focal adhesion protein GIT2 protected podocytes from injury in rodent proteinuric disease models. GIT2 facilitated translocation of tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B to focal adhesions where it dephosphorylates p130Cas, thereby suppressing Rac1 activity. Stabilizing GIT2 or facilitating GIT2 localization to focal adhesions in podocytes could be a therapeutic strategy in proteinuric kidney diseases. Background Podocytes have an intricate structure featured by numerous actin-based projections called foot processes. Rho family of small GTPases, including Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1), play important roles in actin cytoskeletal remodeling required for cell morphology and adhesion. We previously showed that Rac1 activation in podocytes causes foot process effacement and proteinuria, but the upstream and spatiotemporal regulatory mechanism directing Rac1 is largely unknown. Recently, we identified the focal adhesion protein GIT ArfGAP2 (GIT2) as one of the Rac1 interactors in human podocytes by proximity-dependent biotin identification and proteomics. Methods Systemic and podocyte-specific GIT2 knockout mice were generated and assessed for kidney phenotypes. Human podocytes with GIT2 knockdown (KD) and overexpression were established using lentiviral transduction and characterized. Results GIT2 was enriched in glomeruli, including podocytes, in the mouse kidney. Gene deletion of Git2 in podocytes caused exacerbated proteinuria and foot process effacement when subjected to the minimal change disease model and salt-sensitive hypertension model, which were improved by pharmacological inhibition of Rac1. In cultured podocytes, GIT2 KD resulted in Rac1-dependent cell spreading with marked lamellipodial protrusions, accelerated focal adhesion disassembly, and shorter focal adhesion lifetime. In GIT2 KD podocytes, tyrosine phosphorylation of the focal adhesion protein p130 Crk-associated substrate (Cas) was significantly increased, accompanied by impaired localization of the tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B to focal adhesions. These phenotypes observed in GIT2 KD podocytes were reversed by GIT2 overexpression. Conclusions The results indicate that GIT2 facilitates translocation of PTP1B to focal adhesions where it dephosphorylates p130Cas, thereby suppressing local Rac1 activity and protecting against podocyte injury and proteinuria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207