MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408184850 · doi:10.1007/s00270-025-03994-z

Multicenter, PrOspective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing GenIcular Artery EmbOlization Using Embosphere Microspheres to Corticosteroid iNjections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: MOTION Study Protocol Summary

2025· article· en· W4408184850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clare Bent, Craig J. McAsey, Sandeep Bagla

Bibliographic record

VenueCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMerit Medical SystemsNorthwestern University
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialEmbolizationSurgeryMicrosphereRadiologyUltrasoundCorticosteroidMulticenter trialProspective cohort studyMulticenter studyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Corticosteroid injections are commonly used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis; however, pain relief is usually transient. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) has shown promise as an effective minimally invasive intervention to alleviate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. The MOTION study is being conducted to compare outcomes following GAE versus corticosteroid injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled investigational device exemption (IDE) study enrolling adults (≥ 21 years old) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-4) across ≥ 45 centers worldwide. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive GAE with Embosphere® Microspheres (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) or corticosteroid injections. The primary efficacy measure is clinical success at 6 months, defined as ≥ 50% improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale. The primary safety measure is the proportion of patients free from treatment-related safety event(s) through 6-month post-index procedure (GAE or corticosteroid injection). Following the 6-month visit, patients in either cohort who do not achieve clinical success may crossover to the other study arm. Additional study measures will assess safety and efficacy outcomes throughout the 24-month follow-up period. The target sample size is 264 (132 per arm) and is based on the number of patients needed to confirm superior efficacy of GAE versus corticosteroid injections and non-inferiority with respect to safety. The overall study power is > 80%. DISCUSSION: Findings from the MOTION study are expected to provide information on the magnitude of the therapeutic benefits associated with GAE versus standard of care over 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05818150.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardioVascular and Interventional RadiologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207