MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408244065 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2408792

Remibrutinib in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

2025· article· en· W4408244065 on OpenAlex
Martin Metz, A.M. Giménez-Arnau, Michihiro Hide, Mark Lebwohl, Giselle Mosnaim, Sarbjit Saini, Gordon Sussman, R. Szalewski, Sibylle Haemmerle, K. Lheritier, E.D. Martzloff, Noriko Seko, Pengpeng Wang, Artem Zharkov, Marcus Maurer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboAngioedemaAdverse effectInternal medicineClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialClinical trialGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria is an idiopathic syndrome defined by recurring itch, hives, or angioedema (or a combination of these symptoms) for more than 6 weeks. Remibrutinib, an oral, highly selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed efficacy and favorable safety in phase 2b trials. Data from phase 3 trials are needed. METHODS: -antihistamines. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral remibrutinib at a dose of 25 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 12 in the urticaria activity score during a 7-day period (UAS7), which comprises severity scores for itch and hives during 1 week (scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity). Key secondary end points included adverse events and a UAS7 of 6 or lower at weeks 2 and 12 and a UAS7 of 0 at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 470 patients in REMIX-1 and 455 in REMIX-2 were randomly assigned to receive either remibrutinib (313 and 300 patients, respectively) or placebo (157 and 155 patients, respectively). The remibrutinib group had a significantly greater decrease in the UAS7 at week 12 than the placebo group (least-squares mean [±SE] change, -20.0±0.7 vs. -13.8±1.0 [P<0.001] in REMIX-1 and -19.4±0.7 vs. -11.7±0.9 [P<0.001] in REMIX-2), which appeared to be sustained through week 24. At week 12, significantly more patients in the remibrutinib group than in the placebo group had a UAS7 of 6 or lower (REMIX-1, 49.8% vs. 24.8% [P<0.001]; REMIX-2, 46.8% vs. 19.6% [P<0.001]) and a UAS7 of 0 (REMIX-1, 31.1% vs. 10.5% [P<0.001]; REMIX-2, 27.9% vs. 6.5% [P<0.001]). The percentages of patients with any adverse event and with serious adverse events were similar in the remibrutinib group and the placebo group, although a higher percentage of patients in the remibrutinib group than in the placebo group had petechiae (3.8% vs. 0.3% in the combined groups). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with oral remibrutinib resulted in a significant improvement in a composite measure of itching and hives at week 12. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; REMIX-1 and REMIX-2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT05030311 and NCT05032157, respectively.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it