MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408394404 · doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05674-7

Global trends and hotspots of neuromodulation in spinal cord injury: a study based on bibliometric analysis

2025· article· en· W4408394404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shutao Gao, Yukun Hu, Shuang Li, Wei Li, Weibin Sheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineSpinal cord injuryOrthopedic surgeryNeuromodulationSpinal cordSurgeryInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that can result in permanent disability. Neuromodulation is a promising technology that has gained popularity as a treatment for SCI. This study aims to analyze the published literature to investigate the global trends and hotspots in research on neuromodulation in the context of SCI. METHODS: All relevant publications on the topic of neuromodulation in SCI from January 1, 2005, to September 17, 2024, were acquired from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analysis was performed to evaluate the publication distribution by country, institution, author, and journal, as well as keyword, using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica software. RESULTS: Overall, 3,211 publications were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The publication number in 2005 and 2024 were 77 and 222, respectively. A steady increasing trend in the publication number over the past two decades was observed. The Unites States published 1544 articles with 52,521 citations, ranking first regarding publication number and total citations. Case Western Reserve University was the most productive institution that published 181 papers. All of the highly productive institutions were located in the United States, Canada, and Australia. The University of California Los Angeles harvested 6626 total citations and 81.8 average citations, ranking first among the productive institutions. Gorgey AS published 60 articles and ranked first regarding total publication number. Edgerton VR harvested 4333 citations and ranked first among the authors for total citations. The analysis of high-yielding journals suggested that Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine was the most productive journal with 133 publications. Spinal Cord yielded 4200 citations and ranked first among the journals for total citations. The keyword analysis identified "functional electrical stimulation" and "spinal cord stimulation" as research hotspots. CONCLUSION: This study delineates the current knowledge landscape and research trends on the topic of neuromodulation in SCI. The findings highlight the growing interest in this field and underscore the significance of neuromodulation in SCI research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0950.132
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and ResearchSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207