MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408771485 · doi:10.3390/en18071601

Optimal Protection Coordination for Grid-Connected and Islanded Microgrids Assisted by the Crow Search Algorithm: Application of Dual-Setting Overcurrent Relays and Fault Current Limiters

2025· article· en· W4408771485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvercurrentDual (grammatical number)GridComputer scienceAlgorithmLimiterFault (geology)Current (fluid)Reliability engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a two-stage protection coordination framework designed for grid-connected and islanded microgrids (MGs) that integrate distributed generations (DGs) and energy storage systems (ESSs). The first stage focuses on determining the optimal location and sizing of DGs and ESSs within the islanded MG to ensure a stable and reliable operation. The objective is to minimize the combined annual investment and expected operational costs while adhering to the optimal power flow equations governing the MG, which incorporates both DGs and ESSs. To account for the inherent uncertainties in load and DG power generation, scenario-based stochastic programming (SBSP) is used to model these variations effectively. The second stage develops the optimal protection coordination strategy for both grid-connected and islanded MGs, aiming to achieve a rapid and efficient protective response. This is achieved by optimizing the settings of dual-setting overcurrent relays (DSORs) and determining the appropriate sizing of fault current limiters (FCLs), using operational data from the MG’s daily performance. The goal is to minimize the total operating time of the DSORs in both primary and backup protection modes while respecting critical constraints such as the coordination time interval (CTI) and the operational limits of DSORs and FCLs. To solve this complex optimization problem, the Crow Search Algorithm (CSA) is employed, ensuring the derivation of reliable and effective solutions. The framework is implemented on both 9-bus and 32-bus MGs, demonstrating its practical applicability and evaluating its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. The proposed method achieves an expected total daily relay operation time of 1041.36 s for the 9-bus MG and 1282 s for the 32-bus MG. Additionally, the optimization results indicate a reduction in maximum voltage deviation from 0.0073 p.u. (grid-connected mode) to 0.0038 p.u. (islanded mode) and a decrease in daily energy loss from 1.0114 MWh to 0.9435 MWh. The CSA solver outperforms conventional methods, achieving a standard deviation of 1.13% and 1.21% for two optimization stages, ensuring high reliability and computational efficiency. This work not only provides valuable insights into the optimization of MG protection coordination but also contributes to the broader effort of enhancing the reliability and economic viability of microgrid systems, which are becoming increasingly vital for sustainable energy solutions in modern power grids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it