Chromosome-level genome assembly of a doubled haploid brook trout ( <i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) is a socioeconomically important fish species for fisheries, aquaculture, and aquatic conservation. We produced a 2.5-Gb reference assembly by combining Hi-C chromosome conformation capture with high-coverage short- and long-read sequencing of a fully homozygous mitotic gynogenic doubled-haploid fish, which facilitates the assembly of highly complex salmonid genomes. The assembly has an N50 of 50.98 Mb and 88.9% of the total assembled sequence length is anchored into 42 main chromosomes, of which 63.44% represents repeated contents, including 1,461,010 DNA transposons. 56,058 genes were found, with 98.6% of the 3,640 expected conserved orthologs BUSCO genes (actinopterygii_odb10 lineage database). Additionally, we found significant homology within the 42 chromosomes, as expected for this pseudo-tetraploid species, as well as with the sister species lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). This assembly will serve as a reliable genomic resource for brook trout, thus enabling a wider range of reference-based applications to support ongoing research and management decision-making for the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".