Inavolisib plus letrozole or fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (GO39374): An open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1/1b study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A variety of treatment options continue to be explored in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) setting for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC), and optimal sequencing of therapies remains to be determined. This phase 1/1b study examined inavolisib, a potent and selective PI3Kα inhibitor that promotes mutated p110α degradation, alone and in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) ± palbociclib, in PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative LA/mBC. We report data on inavolisib plus ET, including in patients who had previously received a CDK4/6i. METHODS: Women age ≥ 18 years received inavolisib (6 mg/9 mg orally once daily [PO QD]) plus letrozole (2·5 mg PO QD), or inavolisib (9 mg PO QD) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 then every 4 weeks), until unacceptable toxicity/disease progression. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: safety and tolerability. FINDINGS: Thirty-seven and 60 patients were enrolled in the inavolisib plus letrozole and inavolisib plus fulvestrant arms, respectively. Overall, treatment-related adverse events (mostly low grade) occurred in 94·6 % and 93·3 % of patients, respectively; the most frequent (≥10 % of patients in either arm) were hyperglycaemia, stomatitis, nausea, and diarrhoea. Confirmed objective response rates in patients with measurable disease were 9·7 % and 25·9 %, respectively; median progression-free survival was 3·7 and 7·3 months. Among patients with previous CDK4/6i therapy (29/37 and 58/60 patients, respectively), confirmed objective response rates were 13·0 % and 25·0 %; median progression-free survival was 3·7 and 7·1 months. No drug-drug interactions were observed for any study treatment. Paired baseline and Cycle 1 Day 15 tumour biopsies and circulating tumour DNA analyses demonstrated the impact of study treatment on pharmacodynamic/pathophysiologic biomarkers of response. INTERPRETATION: Inavolisib plus ET demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging preliminary anti-tumour activity in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative LA/mBC, including those in the post-CDK4/6i setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".