MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409068295 · doi:10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100077

Implications of dissolved organic carbon, turbidity and salinity on detection and monitoring of cyanobacteria using UV–VIS derivative spectrophotometry

2025· article· en· W4409068295 on OpenAlexafffund
Amitesh Malhotra, Banu Örmeci

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Water · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbidityDissolved organic carbonSalinityCyanobacteriaEnvironmental chemistrySpectrophotometryEnvironmental scienceTotal organic carbonChemistryChromatographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyanobacterial blooms are now a long-standing and recurring environmental issue around the globe due to their potential toxicity and accompanying negative impacts, such as the formation of taste and odor compounds, water discoloration, scum formation, to name a few. Early detection and routine monitoring of source water is, therefore, an increasing need, and methods to promptly identify cyanobacterial presence are critical. In this study, M. aeruginosa was used to test the impact of three water quality parameters (WQP), including salinity, DOC (dissolved organic carbon), and turbidity, on the detection and monitoring of cyanobacteria using UV-Vis derivative spectrophotometry. The study established the method detection limits under a wide range of WQP. Further, the effect of two cuvette pathlengths (50-, and 100-mm) and two exposure times (90 and 180 mins) at two peaks, corresponding to photopigments chlorophyll-a ( Chl-a ) and phycocyanin (PC), were investigated while applying and Savitzky-Golay (S-G) first derivative of absorbance technique to improve sensitivity. Results indicate that the relationship between the two photopigments and absorbance was generally strong (R 2 > 0.9), except for higher turbidity tests (R 2 > 0.8), and 100 mm pathlength was found to be the most sensitive in terms of detection. Additionally, there was no significant change in absorbance, detection limit, or slope observed between the two exposure times. The lowest detection limits using the established method were found to be 11,083 cells/mL and 12,632 cells/mL for 1 mg/L DOC for Chl-a and PC, respectively. Sensitivity analyses revealed slight variations in slopes of regression with increasing WQP concentration, which was expected with increasing interfering contaminants. Overall, the results demonstrate that despite varying WQPs, with the aid of derivate spectrophotometry and longer cuvette pathlength (100 mm), the method can be successfully used for potential detection and monitoring of cyanobacteria in different source waters. • Derivative spectrophotometry was used for testing cyanobacteria in water matrices. • 3 concentrations of salinity, dissolved organic carbon, and turbidity were tested. • Lowest MDL was found to be 11,083 & 12,632 cells/mL for 1 ppm DOC for Chl-a and PC . • Similar results were found with increasing exposure times from 90 and 180 mins. • Longer cuvette pathlengths (50 and 100 mm) could sensitively detect M. aeruginosa .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCleaner WaterSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207