MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409630666 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-1269

Abstract 1269: Development of humanized PDX mouse model for high grade serous ovarian cancer

2025· article· en· W4409630666 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Lam, Farhia Kabeer, Shary Chen, Makoto Kishida, Yuchen Ding, L Zoltán, Yvette Drew, David G. Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencySpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerous ovarian cancerOvarian cancerSerous fluidCancerMedicineCancer researchInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is one the most lethal gynecological cancer, accounting for 70% deaths and with a 5-year survival rate below 50%. Traditionally, HGSOC are considered 'immune-cold' tumors, characterized by low immune infiltration and poor response rates to single agent immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). To improve the therapeutic potential of immunotherapies in HGSOC, combination treatments are being applied such as the Phase 2 MEDIOLA trial, which aims to identify mechanisms of response and resistance. A major challenge in this field remains the lack of suitable preclinical models for ICB-based treatments. Although patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) are valuable for developing new therapies, they are limited by the absence of an immunocompetent host. Here we present humanized mouse models incorporating human immune cells. Methods: Female NRG-W41-3GS mice (ENW) aged 7-8 weeks were used to generate the humanized PDX model. HGSOC tumors originally sourced from human patients and maintained in our laboratory’s previous PDX models using NRG mice, were injected subcutaneously into ENW mice. After 3 weeks, 5x104 human hematopoietic CD34+ cells collected from umbilical cord blood of healthy donors were intravenously injected via the tail vein. To monitor human cell engraftment, bone marrow (BM) aspiration was performed at week 6 post-CD34+ cell injection, and peripheral blood (PB) samples were collected from saphenous vein starting from week 7 until the experimental endpoint. BM and PB samples were analyzed by flow cytometry using antibodies against human CD45 and mouse CD45 to determine humanization level. Tumors were harvested at the endpoint, embedded in paraffin, and remaining tumor tissues were cryopreserved for future. To confirm human immune cell infiltration into the tumors, fresh frozen paraffin embedded tumor sections were immunohistochemically stained with rabbit anti-human CD45 antibodies. Results: We successfully generated sixteen huENW PDX mice. Robust engraftment of human CD34+ cells was confirmed in each mouse, with human CD45+ cells ranging from 35% to 90% (mean ± SD: 76.2 ± 18.5%) in BM samples and from 7% to 35% in PB samples. The huENW PDX model have revealed strong evidence of human immune infiltration with CD45+ cells on immunohistochemistry of the PDX tumors and spleen. Conclusion: Humanized mouse models offer a valuable resource for advancing HGSOC research. Our humanized PDX HGSOC mouse model demonstrated significant engraftment of human immune infiltration into HGSOC tumors. Future works will focus on characterizing tumor cell heterogeneity, analyzing spatial gene expression patterns and human immune cells distribution using Xenium in situ coupled with scRNA seq. We believe our model has the potential to enhance our understanding of HGSOC clonal diversity, microenvironment interactions, and contributing to the development of new therapies. Citation Format: Tsz Yin (Jacky) Lam, Farhia Kabeer, Shary Chen, Makoto Kishida, Yuchen Ding, Lorena Zoltan, Yvette Drew, David Huntsman. Development of humanized PDX mouse model for high grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1269.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207