MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409665893 · doi:10.1097/iop.0000000000002941

Identifying Minimum Single Dose of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase for In Vitro Dissolution of Twenty-Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

2025· article· en· W4409665893 on OpenAlexaff
Rasika Sudharshan, Shaili S. Davuluru, Alena Shen, Shreya Gupta, Nikta Saeedi, Julie A. Woodward, Wendy W. Lee, Femida Kherani, Jill A. Foster, Sandy Zhang-Nunes

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronidaseHyaluronic acidMedicineFiller (materials)DissolutionMannitolSurgeryMaterials scienceBiologyBiochemistryChemistryComposite materialAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: As the use of hyaluronic acid fillers continues to increase for clinical and aesthetic purposes, associated complications continue to rise as well. Excess hyaluronidase is often used to dissolve filler, which has its own set of adverse effects. This study analyzes 22 commercially available fillers to delineate the lowest single dose of recombinant human hyaluronidase (RHH) required to fully dissolve each filler within 6 hours across 3 trials. METHODS: Aliquots in 0.2 ml amounts of each of 22 hyaluronic acid fillers were placed in wells. A single dose of RHH, titrated to a minimum volume of 0.45 cc, was administered to the center of the aliquot, to a maximum of 140 units. RHH amounts were as follows: 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, or 140 units RHH. Bird's eye and lateral photographs were taken to monitor dissolution progress at several time points over the 6-hour period to monitor aliquot height and appearance changes. Filler aliquots were left undisturbed for 6 hours, after which dissolution was confirmed by stirring the aliquot on video recording. This process was repeated 3 times per filler to determine the minimum dose of RHH required to consistently dissolve each aliquot. RESULTS: For each of the 22 fillers, the minimum dose of RHH required for dissolution was identified with consistent results across 3 trials, demonstrating reliability. Juvéderm Volbella, Juvéderm Vollure, Juvéderm Skinvive, Restylane-L, Restylane Lyft, and Restylane Silk were identified as the least resistant fillers, requiring ≤20 units to dissolve. Resilient hyaluronic acid (RHA) 2, RHA 3, RHA 4, Belotero Volume, Juvéderm Ultra XC, Juvéderm Volux, Restylane Kysse, and Revanesse Versa were classified as most resistant, requiring ≥120 units to dissolve. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies the minimum single dose of RHH from 2.5 units/0.2 ml to 140 units/0.2 ml for dissolution of 22 different hyaluronic acid fillers over 6 hours. These results paired with previous studies help elucidate the dissolution profiles of each filler in the context of their rheological properties, further informing physicians on how to optimally dissolve different hyaluronic acid fillers in a clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySame topicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207