hESCs‐derived Organoids Achieve Liver Zonation Features through LSEC Modulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liver zonation, essential for diverse physiological functions, is lacking in existing organoid models, hindering their ability to recapitulate liver development and pathogenesis. Addressing this gap, this work explores the feasibility of achieving zonated organoid by co-culturing human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived hepatocytes (HEP) with hESCs derived liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) exhibiting characteristics of either the liver lobule's pericentral (PC) or periportal (PP) regions. Introducing zonated LSECs with variable WNT2 signaling subtly regulate hepatocyte zonation, resulting in noticeable metabolic function changes. Considering the lipid metabolism variations in PC and PP organoids, this work constructs biomimetic zonated metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) organoids and revealed that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) directly target LSECs, indicating potential therapeutic mechanisms of GLP-1RA in MAFLD alleviation. This study highlights the crucial role of non-parenchymal cells in organoids for recapitulating niche heterogeneity, offering further insights for drug discovery and in vitro modeling of organ heterogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".