MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT198: A first-in-human study evaluating safety, tolerability and efficacy of TEV-56278, as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

2025· article· en· W4409822021 on OpenAlexaff
Jason J. Luke, Lillian L. Siu, Mario Sznol, Yael Shalit, Jerry Weaver, Samhita Chakraborty

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabTolerabilityMedicineOncologySolid tumorInternal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsMedical physicsAdverse effectCancerClinical trialImmunotherapyPhases of clinical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Direct immune stimulation using cytokines, including interleukin-2 (IL-2), drives immune-mediated cytotoxic cancer responses. Toxicity of high-dose IL-2 limits its activity and clinical utility. Preclinical studies show that targeting IL-2 to specific cell subsets substantially increases its therapeutic index. In multiple cancers, tumor-infiltrating T-cells display higher levels of programmed cell death protein (PD-1) relative to circulating and tissue-resident T-cells, making PD-1 a target for selective delivery of IL-2. TEV-56278 is a human antibody-cytokine fusion protein comprised of an antibody targeting PD-1 and attenuated IL-2. TEV-56278 is designed to deliver IL-2 selectively to PD-1+ T cells, thus amplifying anti-tumor T-cell activity while minimizing off-target systemic toxicities. Furthermore, its binding to PD-1 receptors does not block ligand binding and does not compete for binding with known PD1-blocking antibodies, allowing for combination use. Here, we describe a phase 1a/1b trial design evaluating TEV-56278 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, Phase 1, first-in-human, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study is being conducted in 3 parts. Patients >18 years of age with various locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who have progressed on or were intolerant to standard of care therapies and resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 treatment will be included. The primary objective of dose escalation is to assess safety, tolerability and determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TEV-56278 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives include assessment of pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor activity. Determination of the maximum tolerated dose will be based on a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design. Additional pharmacodynamic and biomarker data, including biomarkers of IL-2 signaling and activation of PD-1+ T cells, will be collected during backfill of monotherapy dose cohort(s). After determination of the monotherapy RP2D, 2 cohorts of patients with locally advanced or metastatic primary and secondary resistant melanoma (A&B) and 2 cohorts of primary and secondary resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; [C&D]) will be accrued to evaluate the primary objective of anti-tumor activity. The Simon two-stage admissible design will be used for Cohort B (RP2D and a dose Citation Format: Jason John Luke, Lillian L. Siu, Mario Sznol, Yael Shalit, Jerry Weaver, Samhita Chakraborty. A first-in-human study evaluating safety, tolerability and efficacy of TEV-56278, as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT198.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→