MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410085911 · doi:10.2196/preprints.76787

Pediatric Oncology Knowledge Mobilization in Canada: Protocol for an Environmental Scan (Preprint)

2025· preprint· en· W4410085911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily K. Drake, Catherine Foulem, Ekaterini Damoulianos, Stephanie Reid, Michel Duval, Kirsten Efremov, James L. Foster, Karen M. Haas, Argerie Tsimicalis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintPediatric oncologyProtocol (science)MedicineOncologyComputer scienceInternal medicineWorld Wide WebCancerPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Nonprofit organizations that serve the pediatric oncology community play a crucial role in disseminating quality information that can inform and support people living with childhood cancer, those that work in the field, and others who make key decisions or policies. These registered organizations can be challenging to locate, as the internet is flux with information and resources of varying quality, misinformation, and disinformation. There remains limited understanding of the knowledge mobilization landscape of these organizations in Canada. OBJECTIVE This study will provide an overview of the pediatric oncology nonprofit organizational landscape and describe their knowledge mobilization efforts related to dissemination, highlighting existing strengths, gaps, and novel opportunities to strengthen and unite efforts. METHODS A novel environmental scan methodology will be employed to search government and nonprofit organizations’ databases. Independent reviewers will screen the websites of eligible organizations. Extracted data will be descriptively analyzed, geographically sorted, and presented in a tabular form with accompanying narrative. RESULTS This project received funding in 2024. We anticipate that preliminary results will be available by summer 2025. The search strategy for this study will be completed in the spring of 2025. One key project milestone for this environmental scan includes sharing drafts of the results from this strategy through expert consultations in the spring of 2025. After this milestone, a full set of preliminary results will be available by summer 2025, and the final manuscript will be submitted in fall 2025. CONCLUSIONS The environmental scan will explicate each step of our method to allow others the opportunity to garner understanding from our learnings. Findings will be disseminated to the broader community via social media, directly to the pediatric oncology network in Canada, and globally, through summaries, infographics, presentations, and traditional academic outputs. By doing so, the pediatric oncology community will have information pertinent to navigating these resources, and further steps can be devised to bolster the knowledge mobilization capacity in Canada. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/76787

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.096
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.096
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2010.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→