Pengaruh Kompetensi, Komitmen Organisasi Dan Work-life balance Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Bagian Keuangan RSUD Dr. Mohamad Soewandhie Surabaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kompetensi, komitmen organisasi, dan work-life balance terhadap kinerja pegawai bagian keuangan RSUD Dr. Mohamad Soewandhie Surabaya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis regresi untuk menguji pengaruh variabel bebas secara parsial dan simultan terhadap variabel terikat. Sampel penelitian ini berjumlah 36 pegawai yang diambil menggunakan teknik sampel jenuh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara parsial, kompetensi, komitmen organisasi, dan work-life balance memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai. Secara simultan, ketiga variabel ini juga berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai. Dari ketiga variabel tersebut, kompetensi memiliki pengaruh dominan terhadap kinerja pegawai bagian keuangan RSUD Dr. Mohamad Soewandhie Surabaya. Berdasarkan temuan ini, disarankan agar pihak rumah sakit meningkatkan investasi dalam pengembangan kompetensi pegawai melalui pelatihan dan pengembangan profesional. Selain itu, dukungan dari manajemen puncak serta kebijakan yang mendukung keseimbangan kerja dan kehidupan pribadi pegawai perlu diperhatikan untuk meningkatkan kinerja secara optimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".