MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410103279 · doi:10.1111/imm.13922

Human Alveolar Macrophages Detect SARS‐CoV‐2 Envelope Protein Through TLR2 and TLR4 and Secrete Cytokines in Response

2025· article· en· W4410103279 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Conor Grant, Emily Duffin, Finbarr O’Connell, Parthiban Nadarajan, Colm Bergin, Joseph Keane, Mary P. O’Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience Foundation IrelandHealth Research BoardWellcome TrustCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsTLR2Immune systemInflammationSecretionImmunologyCytokineTLR4Tumor necrosis factor alphaBiologyInnate immune systemProinflammatory cytokineToll-like receptorLungMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the most numerous immune cells of the lung and are the resident, sentinel lung immunocytes that summon trafficking immune cells to the compartment. Immune profiling of AMs from COVID-19 patients implicates AMs in the immune circuits that drive pulmonary inflammation in severe COVID-19 infection. However, little is known about human AM responses to SARS-CoV-2 proteins, such as the spike protein and envelope protein. We aimed to understand if human AMs recognize SARS-CoV-2 proteins and how they respond. We found that human AMs do not sense SARS-CoV-2 spike protein but do sense envelope protein via the pattern recognition receptors TLR2 and TLR4, secreting IL-1β, IFNγ, IL-12p70, IL-6, and TNFα in response. AMs from donors over the age of 70 years produced significantly more cytokines than those from younger patients following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein. AMs from current smokers had lower cytokine secretion. This is the first report of human AMs producing cytokines in response to SARS-CoV-2 proteins and the first to correlate those responses with clinical risk factors. These results may partly explain why older adults are at such high risk of severe lung inflammation in COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207